Discretion on Aesthetics Not Enough to Trigger CEQA Review
Submitted by jstephens on 8 July 2010 - 9:59pm
In approving a redevelopment project that relies on a 20-year-old environmental impact report, the City of San Diego was not required to conduct supplemental environmental review on the issue of climate change, where the only discretionary action for a project was limited to project aesthetics, the Fourth District Court of Appeal has ruled.