other
In Brief
1 December 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherMake sure to read CP&DR's monthly installments of In Brief, an exclusive selection of updates and fresh ideas on land use planning in California.
Price: $2.95Segmentation, Lack of Review Sink L.A. Port Expansion Project
1 December 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherA state appellate court has halted a project at the Port of Los Angeles because the city never studied the development’s environmental impacts. The court rejected the city’s arguments that the project was covered by a 1997 environmental impact report and a 2000 subsequent EIR because the project had not been contemplated in 1997, and there was no evidence the 2000 study considered the project.
Price: $2.95Land-use ballot measures, November 2002
1 December 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherCompiled by the CP&DR editorial staff, the following is a complete list of land use ballot measures voted on in the November 2002 election.
Price: $2.95Parking Rules Are Exempt From Environmental Study, Court Rules
1 December 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherA city resolution restricting parking on certain residential streets to residents with parking permits was categorically exempt from environmental review, the Second District Court of Appeal has ruled.
Price: $2.95Sea Wall Qualifies For Emergency Exemption Despite Process Delays
1 December 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherAn exemption to the California Environmental Quality Act for construction of a sea wall below two houses has been upheld by the Fourth District Court of Appeal. The court ruled that the potential collapse of a bluff could threaten public safety and qualified for an emergency exemption under CEQA.
Price: $2.95Court Upholds Off-Site Mitigation Deal for Impact of New Houses
1 November 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherThe California Coastal Commission’s decision to allow Malibu property owners who are building new houses to exchange existing public view corridors on their property for dedication of an off-site public access to the beach has been upheld by the Second District Court of Appeal.
Price: $2.95Court Rules Builders Four Applications Should Be Reviewed as One Project
1 November 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherThe City of Los Angeles was correct to treat as one project a builder’s various proposals for 21 new houses on existing parcels on two streets, the Second District Court of Appeal has ruled. The court rejected the builder’s contention that the city could not demand an environmental impact report on the 21 houses, five of which have already been built.
Price: $2.95In Brief
1 November 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherDon't forget to check out CP&DRs monthly installment of "In Brief," a summary look at the latest events in land use news across the Golden State.
Price: $2.952002 Land Use Legislation Round-Up
1 November 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherSidebar to the featured story in the Novermber 2002 edition of CP&DR, "Governor Signs Housing Bills, Rail Bond."
Price: $2.95Project Opponents Had 180 Days to Sue Regarding Lack of Analysis
1 November 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherOpponents of a proposed recycling center were too late in filing a lawsuit regarding a city’s failure to prepare an environmental study on the city’s sale of land to the recycling company, the Fourth District Court of Appeal has ruled.
Price: $2.95