Featured Articles
Voters In Napa County, SF, SoCal To Decide Measures
1 May 2008 - 10:36am | Author: Paul Shigley
Price: $2.95Takings Lawsuit Settlement Hinges On Legislation
1 May 2008 - 9:13am | Author: CP&DR Staff
Price: $2.95City Of Industry Redevelopment Extension Dies - For Now
25 April 2008 - 11:43am | Author: CP&DR Staff
Price: $2.95Stormwater Regulations Proliferate
4 April 2008 - 12:11pm | Author: Paul Shigley
Price: $2.95Developers Halt Planning In SJ's Coyote Valley
25 March 2008 - 8:35am | Author: CP&DR Staff
Price: $2.95Air Pollution Fee On Development Upheld
21 March 2008 - 3:12pm | Author: CP&DR StaffAn air pollution fee on new development in the San Joaquin Valley has been upheld by a Fresno County Superior Court. Judge Donald Black rejected numerous arguments against the fee in a lawsuit filed by the California Building Industry Association (CBIA), the Modesto Chamber of Commerce, Valley Taxpayers Association and affordable housing developer Coalition of Urban Renewal Excellence.
Price: $2.95Regional Planning Bill Remains A Priority
3 March 2008 - 11:04am | Author: Paul Shigley
Price: $2.95Developer's Initiative Thrown Out, Citizen Initiative Upheld
25 February 2008 - 10:20am | Author: CP&DR StaffA pro-development initiative in San Luis Obispo County was not the proper subject for an initiative, a San Luis Obispo Superior Court judge has ruled. Meanwhile, a slow-growth initiative approved by Loma Linda voters in 2006 was upheld by a San Bernardino County Superior Court judge.
Price: $2.95Housing Market Stalls, Evolves At Same Time
29 January 2008 - 9:19am | Author: CP&DR StaffBut while the downturn has reached nearly every corner of the state, some markets are stronger than others. In particular, exurban markets are weak, while urban markets focused on infill development are relatively strong.
Price: $2.95Eminent Domain Initiatives Qualify For June Ballot
24 January 2008 - 7:28am | Author: CP&DR StaffAn initiative that would prevent the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes and ban local rent control laws has qualified for the June ballot. The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and the California Farm Bureau Federation are the primary proponents. In addition, a competing, more limited measure that would prohibit the taking of owner-occupied, single-family houses for economic development has also qualified for the same June ballot.
Price: $2.95
