top of page

Coastal Permit Conditions Are Land-Use Restrictions, Not Exactions

In a seawall case from coastal Encinitas, the California Supreme Court has refused to expand the meaning of the Mitigation Fee Act to allow landowners to accept land-use permit conditions under protest and proceed with the project’s construction anyway. Instead, the court ruled that the Encinitas landowners forfeited their right to protest when they built a new seawall under a permit from the Coastal Commission that contained conditions the landowners later challenged in court.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to cp-dr.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Recent Posts

See All
CEQA Firm Wins Attorney's Fees Case

Links to labor unions were too speculative to prove potential financial benefit -- and Housing Accountability Act argument also failed.

 
 
bottom of page