Developers Can't Use "Upstream" Cap-And-Trade Allowances To Offset GHG Emissions

William Fulton
Jun 29, 2025
3 min read

Updated: Jan 15

In a new battle between the Tejon Ranch Company and environmentalists, an appellate court has ruled that Los Angeles County’s environmental impact report for the Centennial community in Antelope Valley was misleading because it tried to count “upstream” reductions in greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the state’s cap-and-trade program.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to cp-dr.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe Now

Recent Posts

See All

A Cheeky Plan To Win CEQA Attorney's Fees Fails

A Berkeley citizen group lost its challenge to People's Park in the legislature and the California Supreme Court. But that didn't stop the group from claiming enough of a victory to seek $1 million in

Benicia Properly Used SB 35 For Projects In Historic Arsenal District

A challenge to two SB 35 projects in Benicia by a local preservation group – arguing, among other things, that the projects involved historic structures and wetlands – has been struck down by the Firs

La Habra Housing Element Case Published

A case which says a city can delegate final approval of its housing element to the city manager -- and not hold a final approval -- has been published by the Fourth District Court of Appeal.