Development Agreement Trumps Vesting Tentative Map

William Fulton
Jun 15, 2020
3 min read

A developer in Murrieta was not protected by a vesting tentative map from being charged the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee, which was adopted after the map was approved, the Fourth District Court of Appeal.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to cp-dr.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe Now

Recent Posts

See All

Welcome to the new CP&DR website!

We are happy to announce CP&DR’s website has been successfully moved to a new host! If you are a current subscriber we have set up your profile on this new website, and have credited you with full

A Cheeky Plan To Win CEQA Attorney's Fees Fails

A Berkeley citizen group lost its challenge to People's Park in the legislature and the California Supreme Court. But that didn't stop the group from claiming enough of a victory to seek $1 million in

Benicia Properly Used SB 35 For Projects In Historic Arsenal District

A challenge to two SB 35 projects in Benicia by a local preservation group – arguing, among other things, that the projects involved historic structures and wetlands – has been struck down by the Firs