Is "Complying with" A General Plan The Same As Being "Consistent With" It?

William Fulton
Sep 30, 2025
2 min read

Updated: Jan 15

A Jurupa Valley landowner seeking to build a 10-unit-per-acre mobile home park in a 2-unit-per-acre residential zone doesn’t need a general plan amendment to move the application forward, an appellate court has ruled. The court seemed to place the zoning code above the general plan, but it also found provisions in the general plan that seemed to support the project.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to cp-dr.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe Now

Recent Posts

See All

A Cheeky Plan To Win CEQA Attorney's Fees Fails

A Berkeley citizen group lost its challenge to People's Park in the legislature and the California Supreme Court. But that didn't stop the group from claiming enough of a victory to seek $1 million in

Benicia Properly Used SB 35 For Projects In Historic Arsenal District

A challenge to two SB 35 projects in Benicia by a local preservation group – arguing, among other things, that the projects involved historic structures and wetlands – has been struck down by the Firs

La Habra Housing Element Case Published

A case which says a city can delegate final approval of its housing element to the city manager -- and not hold a final approval -- has been published by the Fourth District Court of Appeal.