Prop. 13's Vote Requirement May Yet Survive Upland Ruling Intact

Sep 14, 2017

4 min read

CP&DR’s August 30, 2017 issue reported on the California Supreme Court decision two days earlier that seemed to upend a major provision of Proposition 13 and its companion laws. Exuberant as it is, that analysis is misguided.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to cp-dr.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe Now

Recent Posts

See All

Developer Sues Menlo Park Over Sunset Magazine Project

Historic Inventory CEQA Case Published

The move means that a ruling requiring CEQA analysis on the removal of each indnividual historic resoruce may now be used as precedent in future court cases.

CEQA Mitigations And Exemptions Don't Mix

In a case from Menifee, an appellate court rules that a project's sound wall was a mitigation and therefore the Class 32 exemption can't be applied.