A large residential and commercial development in Upland is back on track after an appellate court lifted an order that halted some grading. Although litigation filed by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District against developers of the Colonies Crossroads continues, construction is proceeding. The two sides are in a dispute regarding the cost and design of 65 acres worth of flood control facilities on the property along the 210 freeway in far western San Bernardino County (see , December 2003). After losing in Superior Court, the county appealed to the Fourth District Court of Appeal, which blocked further grading for new flood control facilities. But in late December, the court ruled that halting the flood control work threatened public safety, and the court lifted the injunction. Construction resumed full speed shortly thereafter, and, in January, the City of Upland approved a final map and amended development agreement for the 440-acre, 1,150-unit project. Although the county and the developers have fought vigorously in court and in the press, Scott Sommer, an attorney for The Colonies Partners, said the dispute could be resolved. "There are some serious settlement discussions getting started," Sommer said. DEVELOPERS OF A "NEW TOWN" development in the San Joaquin County city of Lathrop have settled a lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club by agreeing to fund a new agricultural land trust. The River Islands project calls for 11,000 housing units and a 325-acre employment center on 4,800 acres just west of Interstate 5 (see , March 2003). The Sierra Club — which also sued over earlier proposals for a theme park on the site — filed a lawsuit in early 2003 regarding the River Islands environmental impact report. Under the settlement, Cambay Group will pay the Modesto-based Great Valley Center $200,000 to establish a new trust to preserve farmland in the project’s vicinity. Cambay Group must also pay $2,200 per acre (the amount will be adjusted for inflation) for every acre it develops, including about $900,000 up front. The developer could eventually pay more than $8 million into the trust fund. River Islands still needs some state and federal wetlands, flood control and endangered species permits. Construction remains at least one year away. DURING A SEVEN-HOUR HEARING attended by about 400 people, the Coastal Commission approved a housing and commercial development proposed for the Dana Point Headlands in Orange County. The commission voted 7-5 for developer Sanford Edward’s proposal for 122 houses, a 90-room hotel and 40,000 square feet of commercial development on the promontory. Controversy over development of the property has been around for about 15 years. In 1994, the city approved 370 houses and a 400-room hotel, but voters overturned that decision with two referenda (see , February 1997; , December 1994). Among the issues for the latest proposal were habitat for the endangered Pacific pocket mouse and the threatened California gnatcatcher, and the need to move and rebuild a seawall. Environmentalists led by the Surfrider Foundation and the Sierra Club opposed the project and threatened litigation after the Commission voted. The Commission majority contended the proposal was a balanced plan that would protect and enhance open space on half of the 121-acre site. Commissioner Mary Nichols, who was state Resources Agency secretary under Gov. Gray Davis, said that habitat and species would be better off with the project than without it. MARYSVILLE MAYOR DICK HELDER resigned in January while under pressure from Yuba County District Attorney Pat McGrath. Six months earlier, a Yuba County grand jury accused Helder of 20 counts of misconduct for acquiring interests in property within Marysville’s redevelopment project area and failing to disclose that interest. McGrath alleged that the mayor hid his interest by using a "straw buyer." After Helder resigned, a Yuba County judge dismissed the grand jury’s accusation because loss of office was the only potential penalty. COMPETING STREAM PROTECTIONS MEASURES on the Napa County ballot in March appear be dividing residents and interest groups into three camps. Major winemaking groups and most county supervisors support Measure P, which would establish setbacks of 25 to 150 feet between farms and streams depending upon the terrain and waterway (see , May 2003). Property rights activists call Measure P a "land grab" that could prohibit farming and logging on 53,000 acres. Environmentalists say Measure P does not go far enough, and they have thrown their weight behind Measure O, which calls for setbacks as large as 325 feet. Environmentalists say the restrictions are necessary to prevent further conversion of hillside forests to vineyards that are susceptible to erosion. CORRECTION. A story in the January edition on the proposed Las Lomas development near Santa Clarita mischaracterized the seismic issues. According to state maps, no fault runs directly through the site. However, territory that qualifies as special study areas under the Alquist-Priolo Act virtually surrounds the Las Lomas site.

Marin County officials and state Coastal Commissioners agreed to take more time to hash out the nuances of new regulatory proposals that county officials think could impose too many constraints on local farmers even as the Commission seeks to limit the impacts of agricultural activities in the coastal zone. Locals were worried that new regulations - detailed in hundreds of pages of complicated state analysis - would require farmers to get permits to switch agricultural uses, from ranching to grape-growing, for instance, and would tighten rules on building under the Coastal Act. At issue as well are requirements such as setbacks and the allowed ratio of buildings to acres of farmland that a farmer owns. Farmers expressed concerns that overly tight regulations could put them out of business. "Too many rules and regulations leads to outlaw behavior, so getting it right" is essential, Steve Kinsey, chairman of the Commission, told the Marin Independent Journal . The delay in implementing regulations comes as the county withdrew its coastal development plan, giving the sides more time to reach an agreement. The county is expected to resubmit the plan in the fall.  Santa Monica Amends General Plan to Curtail Development In a 4-3 vote, the Santa Monica City Council voted to amend its Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE) to scrap the possibility of 4- and 5-story mixed use buildings on boulevards, except for those including 100 percent affordable housing units and for redevelopment of historic buildings. The vote, advisory in nature until an official vote on May 5, will make it more difficult for four to five story mixed-use residential buildings to be constructed on major boulevards, unless the housing is affordable. The move, promoted by homeowners groups, is seen as a step backwards in a city known for tremendous housing pressures. Critics of the downzoning contend that the city needs more housing of all types and that affordable housing will be difficult to produce in the absence of redevelopment, which was shut down in 2012. Santa Monica's LUCE was adopted to wide acclaim, including an award from the California Chapter of the American Planning Association, in 2010. Santa Monica has the goal of adding 4,955 homes by 2030. The council is expected to confirm its vote in May.  Grand Jury Urges Dissolution of Financially Strapped City of Guadalupe A Santa Barbara County grand jury recommended that the 7,080-population city of Guadalupe dissolve, which would make it the first city in the state to disincorporate since 1973. The report said that more than a decade of financial mismanagement, a declining tax base and increasing debt have doomed the town. City Administrator Andrew Carter said that the vote undersells attempts in the city for reform, wherein city employees have taken a 5 percent pay cut, ground has been broken on a commercial development to add 800 homes, and voters overwhelmingly approved three tax initiatives to bring in over $300,000 to the city budget. Carter added that the report's recommendation conveyed undertones of a chasm between the working-class town - which is about 87 percent Latino - and the county. "The demographics of Guadalupe are the exact opposite of the demographics of Santa Barbara's," Carter told the Los Angeles Times. S.F. Proposes Tighter Policies on Home-Sharing New amendments to the city's so-called Airbnb law proposed by San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee and Supervisor Mark Farrell would beef up restrictions on short-term rentals and apartment-sharing in the city. The amendments would cap all short-term rentals at 120 days a year and would create a new city office to monitor short-term rentals. The proposal comes in response to complaints that the newly enacted "Airbnb law" capping temporary rentals of entire homes at 90 days a year, but residents who are present in their homes could rent out rooms to travelers 365 days a year. Lee said that this provision was unenforceable and is therefore promoting a hard cap on all rentals. An investigation by the San Francisco Chronicle showed that Airbnb had about 5,000 rentals in the city, around two-thirds of which were entire homes. "We are trying to strike a balance between people who do occasional home-sharing to get by, while still preserving neighborhood character and our stock of affordable housing," Tony Winnicker, a senior adviser to the mayor, told the Chronicle. Illegal Pot Farms Taking Water from Streams A new study concludes that Northern California marijuana farmers are using up all of the water that normally supports key populations of the federally endangered Coho salmon in rivers and streams. The study from biologist Scott Bauer measured three watersheds with intense pot cultivation, saying that each pot plant used about six gallons of water per day, consuming about 673,000 gallons of water every day. "Given the specter of climate change...the current scale of marijuana cultivation in Northern California could be catastrophic for aquatic species," Bauer wrote in the study. L.A. Metro Studies Conversion of Orange Line to Rail A new report says that the conversion of a dedicated busway in the San Fernando Valley to a light rail between Chatsworth and North Hollywood would would cost over $1 billion to complete.The route today handles about 30,000 boardings per weekday and will soon be at capacity during peak periods if demand and population increase there, the report from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority states. Officials have lamented that Los Angeles' County's rail-building boom has skipped the valley, which hosts nearly 20 percent of county residents but has just two of Metro's 80 rail stations. But with a light-rail projected to cost between $1.2 billion to $1.7 billion to complete, the report also proposes that metro could buy more buses and build grade separations at the busiest intersections, which would cost between $230 million and $350 million. State Issues New Policy on Sex Offender Residence Restrictions A new policy issued by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation states that California parole agents will have to find a specific link to child victims is they decide to bar sex offender parolees from living near schools and parks. The policy is a response to a state Supreme Court ruling that blanket residency limits under Jessica's Law - which required that any registered sex offender live at least 2,000 feet from schools or parks - go too far in restricting where sex offenders can live. Now the department has a 60-day clock to review the files of around 6,000 sex offender parolees, about half of which are considered child molesters. Federal Court Rejects Dispute over San Onofre Power Plant  A federal judge ruled against power customers in San Diego in their suit against the former San Onofre nuclear power plant, telling them to wage their battle in state courts instead of federal courts. The complaint, coming from San Diego advocacy group Citizens Oversight, alleged that the California Public Utilities Commission and majority plant owner Southern California Edison illegally conspired to assign 70 percent of the $4.7 billion in closing costs for the plant to utility customers rather than stockholders. Attorney Michael Aguirre alleged that the commission and plant owner violated the 5th amendment of the U.S. Constitution in passing on the costs. "In making customers pay for the failed steam generators and permanently shut plant, the CPUC and SCE are taking customers' private property without just compensation," the complaint alleges. San Jose takes fight against MLB to U.S. Supreme Court San Jose is taking a lawsuit against Major League Baseball to the U.S. Supreme Court, saying that  MLB violated federal antitrust laws in blocking the Oakland A's from moving to downtown San Jose. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded unanimously in January that a nearly century-old exemption for the MLB from federal antitrust laws forecloses the city's legal arguments, and that only the Supreme Court or U.S. Congress could change that rule. Though A's owner Lew Wolff has pushed for a deal in San Jose, the San Francisco Giants blocked the move, asserting territorial rights to the South Bay and a vote of league owners balked at upending those rights. "We believe the justices will find MLB's unique ancient antitrust exemption does not apply to the relocation of the A's to San Jose or is in any way essential to our national pastime," Joseph Cotchett, San Jose's lawyer, told the San Jose Mercury News.  Garcetti Announces Land-Use Initiatives  Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti delivered his " State of the City " address last week. He announced that he would pursue several policies related to land use and transportation, including: allowing ride-hailing companies to pick up travelers at LAX airport; applying hotel taxes to Airbnb and other home-sharing services; enacting data-sharing between the city and navigation app Waze to better see traffic patterns; meeting the statewide goal for drought-resistant plants; and installing new trash cans to public spaces.

Petitioners in the Saltonstall CEQA challenge to the Sacramento Kings arena project filed a notice of appeal July 31, but the Sacramento Bee reports the Kings began demolition at the downtown site anyway. The Saltonstall petitioners lost an injunction petition last week in superior court. The Bee reports the Kings' counsel argued that the NBA could purchase and move the team if the arena failed to open on time in October 2016. See http://bit.ly/1s7rraV and http://bit.ly/1saO6AV. With Sacramento's new court document fee rules in place, it will cost you to read the Saltonstall Notice of Appeal and the prior decision, but the names on the appeal are just discernible through the gray slashes digitally imposed on the "preview" display. See the online case index, which itself is free to view, at http://bit.ly/1nnr0Sd. Meanwhile, Bee columnist Marcos Breton reports the basketball team's management are in talks to buy the city's Republic FC soccer team. See http://bit.ly/1ookAa5. Legislature back in session, still trying for a water bond bill The Legislature returned to Sacramento August 4, still not done with the task of replacing the dated water bond proposal that, as of now, is still parked on the statewide November ballot. They also faced results of a major recent public relations campaign to stop or delay fuel tax provisions of the AB 32 greenhouse gas reduction bill before it takes effect. See the Sacramento Bee for a link-rich summary at http://bit.ly/1pVuugs and a larger-scope roundup from KQED's John Myers at http://bit.ly/1uf68lM. The Sacramento Bee reported separately that plastic bag companies were running television ads in a continuing effort to stop SB 270, the statewide plastic bag restriction bill. See http://www.sacbee.com/2014/08/04/6604874/plastic-industry-hitting-tv-again.html. Local governments were still moving to pass their own bans in anticipation of a grandfathering provision in SB 270. Monterey County granted initial approval for a plastic bag ban in its unincorporated areas, with the final approval vote set for August 26, per the Monterey County Weekly at http://bit.ly/1qLbHus. See http://www.cp-dr.com/articles/node-3481 for details on the grandfathering provision and prior legal and legislative history. In two pieces of completed legislation: Governor Jerry Brown has signed AB 1963, a bill by Assembly Speaker Toni Atkins to ease post-redevelopment logistics. The League of California Cities at http://bit.ly/1kCizIo summarizes the new law at http://bit.ly/1kCizIo, with a link to the text. Its major provision is to give the Department of Finance an extra year, until January 1, 2016, to approve Long Range Property Management Plans for real estate caught up in the redevelopment dissolution process. It was also the League that picked up this Monterey County Weekly item on the signing of SB 2119: http://bit.ly/1owAgYO. Per bill analyses on the SB 2119 official site at http://bit.ly/1y0NRJk, the law adds the possibility of a transactions and use tax to the types of taxes that a board of supervisors can invite residents of a county's unincorporated areas to vote into effect for themselves. Delta tunnel plan's comment period has closed The comment deadline closed July 29 for the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) -- the twin-tunnels plan to carry water southbound under the delta rather than into it. The comprehensive California water blog Maven's Notebook posted an "Internet Guide to the Bay Delta Conservation Plan" several weeks ago that walks through the available plan documents (See http://bit.ly/1rRmD9w). Maven will be a good source for further developments as smart water writers start to read and post about the comments. Already she has noted a Capital Public Radio item at http://www.capradio.org/29065 on an anti-tunnel protest rally held in Sacramento to mark the close of the comment period. The BDCP project's own Web site is at http://baydeltaconservationplan.com/Home.aspx. California Economic Summit wants 'peer review' of CEQA guidelines The California Economic Summit civic organization has asked Governor Jerry Brown to conduct a "peer review" by experts and officials of draft revisions to the CEQA Guidelines before they are circulated to the general public. Revisions to the guidelines are in the works at the Office of Planning and Research. See http://www.caeconomy.org/reporting/entry/summit-calls-for-review-of-ceqa-guidelines. San Francisco could soon run out of Prop M office space allowance JK Dineen of the San Francisco Chronicle posted an in-depth news analysis July 29 on downtown planning effects of San Francisco's 1986 Proposition M, which limits new office space construction to 875,000 square feet per year. See http://bit.ly/1kkLKiZ. The SF Business Journal more recently posted a followup story with added details. Both articles report the Planning Commission will start public discussion August 7 on how to proceed if San Francisco construction plans use up the currently available Prop M allowance of office space, which is about 2 million square feet. Dineen puts the amount of proposed office construction at 9.2 million square feet but the Business Journal puts it at more than 11 million. See http://bit.ly/1y0wUyO. Coastal Commission to take up the Sand City matter again, briefly There's one more approval stage ahead for the slightly queasy deal signed at the April Coastal Commission meeting to allow the 368-unit Sand City resort project to go forward in Monterey County. The Commission's August agenda will include a proposed approval for revised detailed findings based on its prior actions in April. Approval of the "eco-resort" for an ecologically fragile dune area upset some environmental advocates in April, especially regarding potential harm to snowy plover on the site. (See http://www.cp-dr.com/articles/node-3474.) The Monterey Herald has a summary of issues at http://bit.ly/1uIR1oL. Sand City has the very last item on the Commission's four-day San Diego agenda. For the proposed revised findings see the large (512 pp.) agenda item file at http://documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports/2014/8/F16a-8-2014.pdf. The Sand City project was a subject of conflict and litigation for years. For some of the prior history see CP&DR's prior coverage from 2008 at see http://www.cp-dr.com/articles/node-1963. Tule Lake preservation group sues over airport fence on camp site The Tule Lake Committee has filed a CEQA court petition to block construction of a fence at Tulelake Airport in Modoc County. The airport, which is used mainly by a crop-dusting company, Macy's Flying Service, occupies part of the footprint of the wartime Tule Lake Relocation Center, later designated the Segregation Center, where more than 18,000 Japanese Americans were incarcerated from 1942 to 1946. The fence has been endorsed by the FAA as needed to secure the runway. Lee Juillerat of the Klamath Falls Herald and News , who has written on camp site preservation issues for years, has a detailed perspective on the matter at http://bit.ly/1poV83T. In a Change.org petition and a public campaign, the petitioners have argued that the fence would interfere with visitors' ability to view the historic site as a whole and would especially block access to families looking for the locations of relatives' barracks. The Tule Lake camp site, now the town of Newell, CA, is near the Modoc-Siskiyou county line about 30 miles south of Klamath Falls, Oregon. For the petition and related campaign materials see https://www.facebook.com/StopTheFence. The suit names Modoc County, where the airport is located, and officials of the nearby Siskiyou County town of Tulelake, with Macy's Flying Service as real party in interest. Khosla posts his side of the Martins Beach story Vinod Khosla, owner of the disputed Martins Beach on the San Mateo County coastside, used op-ed space in the SF Chronicle on August 4 at http://bit.ly/1kC5bUH to post comments arguing the beach "has never been open to public access" in the sense that "prior owners ran a commercial operation" that charged for access. The op-ed repeated Khosla's prior objections to requirements imposed by county and Coastal Commission officials, and it claimed "Coastal Commission staff indicated 'they will need a permit for something sometime, and then we will have them' and 'we will tie you up in red tape.'" It said the prior owners of the property had tried to interest nonprofit and public agencies in purchasing the land for a park but did not find takers. As of July 24, the Commission raised the stakes in the beach battle by posting an invitation on its official http://www.coastal.ca.gov/ site for members of the public to document their past use of Martins Beach in a "prescriptive rights survey". See http://bit.ly/1lBnMe6 for more comment and details. In other news: The Department of Finance has approved release of an additional $4.9 million to continue with San Diego's Horton Plaza project to turn a former department store building into an open downtown public space. The U-T has details at http://bit.ly/1lZ4X4D. KPBS has more background at http://bit.ly/1rRuRys. The approval letter is posted at http://bit.ly/1lZ528x. Nate Donato-Weinstein of SFBJ reports Google has bought more of Mountain View: $98.1 for nine buildings from Boston Properties: http://bit.ly/1xBXxtB. A burst pipe at UCLA led to a flood that wasted 20 million gallons of drinking water. The LA Times at http://lat.ms/1kkaJCD responded with a report on concerns about the age and condition of the city's infrastructure. The SF Chron 's Will Kane writes that Oakland will have to raise "at least $1.75 billion" to keep both the A's and the Raiders in town: http://bit.ly/1owlOAg Both San Francisco and Los Angeles sent representatives to Colorado Springs in July to discuss possibly hosting the 2024 Olympics. The Chron wrote up SF's delegation at http://bit.ly/1spsD7j and the LA Times reported on Mayor Eric Garcetti's trip at http://lat.ms/1oa5Egi. The LA Times says the U.S. Olympic Committee will pick a U.S. host city in 2017. It remains to be seen if San Francisco is sore enough from its losses hosting the America's Cup to hesitate about investing in another one-time international sports event.

Monterey County has settled a lawsuit over its General Plan filed by the LandWatch advocacy group. The settlement includes a commitment to addressing water supply problems and paying more than $400,000 in LandWatch's legal bills. The settlement commits the county to addressing Salinas Valley basin overdraft, seawater intrusion and falling groundwater levels if those remain issues by 2030. The county also agreed to place restrictions on wineries, including limitations on agriculture on steep slopes and stiffening permitting requirements for stand-alone inns and restaurants. San Francisco, Sacramento Pursue Light-Rail Improvements Both San Francisco and Sacramento announced last week that they are taking major steps to improve their light-rail systems. In San Francisco, Mayor Ed Lee announced a plan to spend more than $600 million to replace every single car in the Muni system. The contract, with Seimens Rail Systems, calls for the city to purchase 175 cars, with an option for 85 more. In Sacramento, city officials announced a partnership with downtown business owners to improve the light-rail system there in anticipation of the opening of a downtown sports arena and entertainment center. The effort will focus on operational improvements as well as improving trash pickup and other basic items at the stations. No General Plan Update for Irvine The Irvine City Council voted not to pursue a general plan update in the near future, meaning the city will continue to operate under the plan adopted in 1999. The state recommends that cities update their general plans every five years, but transportation and housing are the only elements those updates are mandatory. In voting against pursuing a plan update, a split city council cited several concerns, including Orange County's control of 100 acres inside the city and the ongoing problems with development of the Great Park. These unresolved issues would make the drafting of a new general plan premature, according to council members who voted against the motion. Some 27 development projects are currently under way in Irvine. Walnut Creek Specific Plan Unveiled Walnut Creek residents got their first glimpse of the West Downtown specific plan, which includes proposed higher-density development in the corridor from Downtown to the Walnut Creek BART station. The plan , produced by PlaceWorks, calls for 2,400 new housing units in addition to 1,700 already in place. The plan not meet with universal support at the rollout meeting. Said one resident of the plan's increased densities: "I don't see character; I see Emeryville, I see San Ramon, and I don't want to live in those towns." State of Jefferson Movement Now Includes Five Counties In far northern California - where compliance with CEQA and other land-use regulations is often viewed as optional already - five counties have joined the long-simmering movement to secede from California and form the new State of Jefferson. Representatives from Tehama, Glenn, and Yuba counties presented the State Legislature with "declarations of separation." They join Siskiyou and Modoc counties in petitioning the legislature to move forward with such a succession.

August 11 would have been the deadline for California's statewide ballots to go to press, but state legislators pushed that date back as they continued to work on a water bond deal with Governor Jerry Brown. According to Ben Adler of Capitol Public Radio, details emerged late in the day of a plan calling for almost $7.2 billion in spending -- most of it in new bond funds -- of which $2.5 billion would support surface water storage projects. He reported the Legislature passed, and Governor Brown signed, bills to delay the voter guide deadline, change the number on the November "rainy day fund" measure to Proposition 2, and label whatever water bond proposal is on the ballot as "Proposition 1". See http://bit.ly/1yoDYFC. The Sacramento Bee has more at http://bit.ly/1kXLI0B. In a more detailed report at http://bit.ly/1oECjLc, Adler reviewed disputed issues, including the goal of making the bond measure "tunnel neutral" with respect to the Governor's Delta tunnel project, and pending proposals for water storage projects, including the Temperance Flat dam proposal. (For a detailed read on Temperance Flat, see blogger Patricia McBroom's article last February at http://bit.ly/1B9TQzP.) If placed on the ballot, the new bond measure would replace the dated $11.1 billion proposal currently on the ballot. The LA Times said a Republican  $8.7 billion counterproposal was also pending as of last Friday. See http://lat.ms/1oxAevz. The LA Times ' Jim Newton has a bigger-picture news analysis on the politics and context of the bond negotiation -- and the fragility of LA's own water infrastructure -- at http://lat.ms/1opsBx7. Other bills before the Legislature this month include major legislation that would make California the last Western state to regulate groundwater use statewide. Dave Puglia of the Western Growers Association told the LA Times , "California hasn't attempted to change water law this dramatically in 100 years." See http://lat.ms/1yjQUML. Ponte Vista project breaks ground with a diminished plan for 676 units A popular article last week by the LA Times ' Andrew Khouri presented the Ponte Vista project in San Pedro as a case study of a large-project proposal whittled down by community opposition to a smaller design with lower density and higher costs per unit than first proposed. He writes that the original 2005 design called for 2,300 condo and town house units plus 10,000 square feet of retail -- but as of the groundbreaking last week, the design called for 676 units including 208 single-family homes. See http://lat.ms/1mpl23M/. A series of stories over the years by Curbed LA , collected at http://la.curbed.com/tags/ponte-vista, recount more of the project's reshaping over time from a large "mixed-use urban village" to a smaller "suburban-ish" gated complex. It says the project changed owners along the way, lost all its proposed rentals, and picked up agreements for an access road, union labor, local hires, and public access to recreation spaces. 'Boomerang campaign' secures Alameda Co. post-redevelopment funds for housing Housing advocates persuaded the Alameda County Supervisors on July 29 to commit a dollop of former Redevelopment funds to affordable housing and homelessness prevention. The Supervisors committed $13.7 million in one-time funds to the programs plus a promise to reserve more for the programs starting in 2016-17: 20% of tax funds that would formerly have gone to Redevelopment, or at least $2 million a year. The one-time commitment consisted of $9.8 million in funds "swept" from ex-Redevelopment accounts reserved for housing, plus $3.9 million of additional ex-Redevelopment funds. The campaign that won the distribution was led by the East Bay Housing Organizations coalition (see http://ebho.org/news) and was associated with the "Boomerang Campaign" of the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California. (See http://nonprofithousing.org/policy-advocacy/the-boomerang-campaign/.) Although the dissolution of the redevelopment agencies ended Redevelopment's 20% housing set-aside for tax-increment funds, the campaign has urged local governments to honor its intent. The campaign frames returned ex-redevelopment amounts as "boomerang funds" and argues that equivalents to the old 20% set-aside � or more � should be used for housing, not simply poured into the general fund. The campaign claims successes in multiple Bay Area towns and counties over the past two years. For details on the Alameda County decision see the Supervisors' July 29 "Attachment 99.3" agenda item. The staff-prepared agenda packet materials are at http://bit.ly/1yoROrs and video is at http://alamedacounty.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=2314. (The vote is reported in the Pleasanton Weekly at http://bit.ly/VdGG3Z. Noted via the League of California Cities.) After court ruling, San Diego considers new approaches to convention center, stadium San Diego officials were regrouping after an appellate court overturned the city's special hotel tax, leaving no agreed way to pay for a convention center expansion. California's Fourth Appellate District had ruled in City of San Diego v. Shapiro that the tax was invalid as approved by hotel landowners/lessees, and instead required approval by two-thirds of the city's voters. (See http://www.cp-dr.com/articles/node-3545.) As the plans headed back to the drawing board, JMI Realty, builders of the existing Petco Park ballpark, were proposing a new San Diego Chargers stadium design that could be combined with a convention center expansion plan. See http://bit.ly/1kXMNpo. In an op-ed at http://bit.ly/1lQ4mCp, City Council member David Alvarez argued that the process by which hotel landowners agreed to tax themselves for the convention center expansion had been short on public participation and would need to broaden into "a citywide civic dialogue". In a Twitter thread beginning at https://twitter.com/sdutOsborne/status/498487348531712001, Alvarez debated with Mark Cafferty of the San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation over the quality of the public process last time around. Cafferty argued that the last approach came out of an inclusive process at the start and had a wide coalition "to push this plan across the finish line"; Alvarez wrote in part, "hoteliers dominated previous process. No real input from public was sought or accepted... Real question is: are hoteliers and the mayor willing to engage the public on options going forward?" Chiu short-term home rental legislation passes SF Planning Commission San Francisco's Planning Commission gave initial approval August 7 to legislation by Board of Supervisors President David Chiu to legalize, regulate and tax short-term rentals through online services such as Airbnb. The Bay Guardian covered the long, contentious hearing at http://bit.ly/1sx5XEQ, reporting the  legislation would require hosts to "register with the city, pay all associated taxes and sign up for liability insurance." Previously, the San Francisco Business Journal reported a new group of short-term rental hosts, the Home Sharers of San Francisco, kicked off a public campaign July 31 in favor of the Chiu legislation. See http://bit.ly/1m5GURx. The Guardian 's former editor, Tim Redmond, gave his own opinionated account of the hearing on his own 48 Hills site at http://bit.ly/1oFHWDM. He and the Guardian described arguments from opponents of the legislation who ranged from former planning officials, to apartment landlords concerned about insurance, to a hotel workers' union representative. Redmond reported that although many short-term rental hosts spoke on their own behalf, no direct representatives of Airbnb or VRBO spoke for the companies at the hearing. The legislation next goes to the Board of Supervisors in September. WeHo developer gives up 'poor door' pool policy but still loses Planning vote Under criticism from the West Hollywood Community Development Department, developers of the 8899 Beverly office building conversion gave up a proposal to bar residential tenants of affordable units from using the property's pool � but they still lost a Planning Commission vote, possibly also due to the size of the project. Southern California Public Radio reported project proponents backed down and agreed to share the pool shortly before the planning commission vote. See http://bit.ly/1ulWBfF (via CACities). The proposal was locally condemned as a "poor door" � a term derived from New York City projects that have fully separate entrances to their affordable sections. Per the LA Times at http://lat.ms/1mEA3Pe, the project calls for renovating a 10-story office building into a mixed-use complex including 64 market-rate and 17 affordable residential units. The Times reports the commission's August 7 vote against the proposal becomes a recommendation to the city council, which will decide the project's future. In other news � The Coastal Commission begins a special four-day session August 12 with a full agenda that includes the expansion of I-5 along the 27-mile North Coast Corridor north of San Diego. See http://coastal.ca.gov/mtgcurr.html. The agenda item, No. 17 on August 13, is at http://documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports/2014/8/W17a-s-8-2014.pdf. In an interview on her plans as Speaker of the Assembly, Rep. Toni Atkins, D-San Diego, told the Voice of San Diego she would support a "down and dirty discussion" of possible legislative changes to CEQA. The paper reported she "questions the need for an environmental impact report when a property owner wants to upgrade or replace an existing building." See http://bit.ly/1BaBj6H. The Sacramento Bee reported on a statewide increase in available charging stations for electric vehicles at http://bit.ly/1orbVoM. The SF Chron 's JK Dineen reported on a proposal by Build, Inc. to build 900 residential units on the 14-acre property at 700 Innes Ave. near the India Basin Open Space in the Bayview District of San Francisco. The paper reports it's "the largest remaining privately owned development site in the city". And it says Build, Inc. is "talking to" the John Stewart Co., a major developer and manager of subsidized housing, about including "for-sale housing targeted at middle-income families" on the site. See http://bit.ly/V88kyS. The water issues weblog Maven's Notebook has posted an August 1 decision by the Mammoth Community Water District to sue the Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District over the Casa Diablo IV geothermal project. The water district contends the project's FEIS/EIR failed adequately to consider effects on groundwater that it says could harm the city water supply. See http://bit.ly/1sLLWad. The Mercury News reported Los Gatos was near approval of a specific plan for a mixed-use development on the "North 40," described as the city's last large vacant parcel. See http://bit.ly/1oFQBGg. The Riverside County town of Hemet approved a specific plan in June for the Ramona Creek mixed-use development at the west end of town. The Press-Enterprise reported recently the project would turn "200 acres of dirt" into "more than 500,000 square feet of retail, entertainment, restaurant, office and mixed-use development along with approximately 1000 houses." Local officials welcomed the plan as the first local major development since the mid-2000s. The developer is Regent Properties of Los Angeles. See http://www.pe.com/articles/hemet-698633-city-development.html. City documents for the specific plan are at http://www.cityofhemet.org/index.aspx?NID=627.

Restrained congratulations were circulating in late November over a deal brokered by Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti that persuaded the Kinkisharyo company to expand its rail car assembly operation in Palmdale after all. The Japanese rail car manufacturing company had threatened to move the planned expansion of its U.S. branch elsewhere after activists supportive of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 11 filed a CEQA appeal with the Palmdale City Council against the expansion. (See prior coverage at http://www.cp-dr.com/articles/node-3601.) The L.A. Times reported the deal allows Kinkisharyo to expand without facing environmental review challenges, while the IBEW will be able to conduct a "card-check" union organizing campaign as it had sought to do. But the paper wasn't happy about the outcome necessarily: that report appeared in an editorial that suggested: " Kinkisharyo and IBEW win; CEQA loses? " The paper suggested that the Legislature in its new session would have reason "to make it harder for groups with ulterior motives -- be they labor unions or business rivals -- to stymie projects," and that in turn would make environmental challenges more difficult for concerned citizens. The Rafu Shimpo has more details of the agreement. Because IBEW Local 11 got the card-check organizing agreement out of the deal, the conservative Breitbart site described the agreement as an abuse of process to gain a labor negotiating advantage. And although the deal preserved the promised production jobs in Palmdale, the Chamber of Commerce wrote that construction jobs were lost because Kinkisharyo went back on its original plan to build a large new assembly building. Protest takes to freeways as well as streets The nationwide demonstrations over accountability for police killings continued to suburbanize, with freeway ramps as well as streets frequently occupied by demonstrators. Sites of freeway occupations in California included Oakland and Berkeley (the Bay Bridge was blocked late on December 8), Sacramento , and Los Angeles -- places where downtown neighborhoods were disrupted by freeway projects in the 20th century. Among commentaries posted, one choice by Planetizen is " On the Symbolism of Highway Protests " featuring Alex Ihnen's NextSTL essay about freeways' ambiguous images as symbols of freedom for some but segregation for others. As of November 25 Ihnen wrote, "At last glance, protesters had closed portions of highways in Detroit, Atlanta, New York City, Cincinnati, Oakland, Nashville, Baltimore, Los Angeles, Washington D.C., and elsewhere." Notorious 'Jungle' encampment evicted in San Jose In early December, after a heavy rain, local authorities staged a full-scale eviction of the famous "Jungle" encampment along Coyote Creek in San Jose. The action followed a city services campaign that has gone on since spring to whittle down the camp's population by moving residents to subsidized housing. The L.A. Times reported "Nearly 150 had found housing, but over 50 had yet to find a place to live." Other news reports said 60 people had been offered city vouchers but couldn't find landlords who would take them. The camp had been a substantial village of some 200 to 300 people, said to be one of the largest unofficial encampments in the United States. Homes at the site reportedly included elaborate underground dwellings, as well as more ordinary tents and lean-tos. Residents had been accepting city help in clearing out trash but the site suffered from lack of sanitation and running water, and had a reputation for violence. Even so, the Mercury News reported some residents were in tears at having to leave without other housing prospects. Some told the paper they had to leave property behind. City policy calls for staff, when they remove campers' property, to preserve and store items of value to be claimed -- but there have been past disputes about how carefully the policy is followed. As CP&DR reported in May , the site was only one of many creekside encampments that provide low-quality housing in an area characterized by high rents, suburban environments, an economy divided between high and low wages, and scarce supplies of SRO-type housing. The practice of camping in creekbeds has intertwined the problems of housing shortage and waterway contamination. In response, some neighbors and officials have called for wholesale evictions of campers. Others have called for initial provision of sanitation facilities as a starting point, and, as a next goal, for plentiful housing away from the creekbed, even if at first such "housing" might take the form of organized camping. News reports on particulars of the eviction have appeared widely, in publications including the San Francisco Chronicle , Los Angeles Times , New York Times , Sacramento Bee , and even the UK's Daily Mail . The KQED public radio station's Michael Krasny hosted a "Forum" debate on the eviction that included an activist organizer and a "Jungle" resident as well as a news reporter, a service provider, and city homeless response team manager Ray Bramson. Listeners' comments responding to the KQED debate and to a news report of the conversation included an essay by Chris Herring, a UC-Berkeley grad student who has become a recognized authority on U.S. encampments. (He's the author of the paper, " The New Logics of Homeless Seclusion: A Comparative Study of Large-Scale Homeless Encampments in the Western U.S. ") Herring wrote that he expected the evicted people would only move to more obscure camp sites elsewhere along Coyote Creek, likely with worse consequences for the creek and for themselves. APA joins amicus for regulating signage by type Do free speech rights trump a city's ability to regulate signs placed in public? The American Planning Association has gotten nervous enough about the answer to join the National League of Cities, U.S. Conference of Mayors and other groups in filing a Supreme Court amicus brief in the case of Reed v. Town of Gilbert . The petitioners in Reed seek to overturn rules in the city of Gilbert, Arizona that regulate publicly placed signs according to their general purpose. In the underlying dispute, a pastor of a Christian church rented space at an elementary school and placed signs announcing services there. He was cited for violating a local sign code regarding the size, placement, and other physical characteristics of "temporary directional signs". The pastor and his church sued on free speech and equal protection grounds, arguing that signs inviting the public to his services were more heavily regulated than other types of signs, such as yard signs for political campaigns. The petitioners argue that the regulations are content-based and hence should be reviewed under a strict scrutiny standard. The city contends it acted properly to apply regulations to the signs based only on their generic purpose, and did not make a content-based decision, so that its actions may be reviewed as regulating only the "time, place and manner" of sign displays. The city has contended that "Petitioners wanted free, permanent, off-site billboards in Gilbert -- and were trying to misuse Gilbert's temporary directional sign regulation to fit that inapposite goal." Courts thus far have upheld the city's action. The APA writes that its brief supports the city, arguing that strict scrutiny of sign codes "has the potential to invalidate nearly all sign codes in the country." Review denied in Pasadena cases The State Supreme Court declined to review City of Pasadena v. Cohen , an August ruling by the Third Appellate district in one of California's many disputes over asset claims of former redevelopment agencies. Pasadena had challenged an effort by the Department of Finance to redistribute property tax funds that the city's post-redevelopment "successor agency" claimed it needed to pay down pension bonds and subsidized housing bonds. At the city's request, the trial court had granted an injunction sequestering the funds until a trial on the merits could be held.  The appellate opinion , by Justices M. Kathleen Butz, George Nicholson and Harry E. Hull, Jr., rejected the city's procedural choices. The appellate panel found the city mistakenly sought declaratory relief when it should have filed for a writ of mandate. They accordingly sent the matter back to the trial judge with instructions to either dismiss the proceeding or "construe it as one for traditional mandate and proceed accordingly." The state Supreme Court also denied review in City of Pasadena v. Superior Court (Mercury Casualty Co.) , the August ruling that paradoxically found a city-owned tree falling on a private home is "serving a public purpose" in doing so for the purpose of allowing the homeowner's insurance claim to go forward. The Second District's opinion was tartly written up in the National Law Review at the time. Ninth Circuit: no new ozone rules The Ninth Circuit turned down a petition in WildEarth Guardians v. McCarthy that sought to require the EPA to create new "Prevention of Significant Deterioration" rules for ozone pollution under the Clean Air Act. It based the rejection on ambiguity in the relevant statute, � 166(a) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. � 7476(a)), saying the law did not establish clearly enough that the duty to establish the standards was mandatory. San Francisco to combine city offices in new tower on SoMa site The San Francisco Board of Supervisors agreed to spend almost $327 million to purchase part of the former Goodwill charity's property at 11th and Market Streets and replace it with a 17-story city office building. The San Francisco Business Times , partly drawing on the Socketsite real estate blog , reported the cost was earlier quoted at $253 million. The reports said developer Related California originally bought the property from Goodwill for $65 million and also planned to develop up to 550 units of housing next to the office building. The site is currently a single-story warehouse-type complex used partly as a thrift store but largely to receive and sort donations. A downtown best-kept secret for years has been the "as-is" shop on 11th Street, where bargain-hunters dig through bins of newly donated items. The news reports say the city will sell its existing five-story office building at 30 Van Ness ( likely for housing ) to help finance the purchase, and will combine offices in the new building for Public Works, Building Inspection, Planning and Retirement and Health Services. Studies look toward more rail in northwestern San Francisco A study commissioned by San Francisco transportation officials predicts a rail extension would be popular if it ran from the end of the currently in-progress Central Subway project westward to Fisherman's Wharf. Michael Cabanatuan of the San Francisco Chronicle reports the study found an extension of the T-Third line to Fisherman's Wharf might increase ridership about 55 percent. Separately, the BART system's planning office announced it would begin a long-range study on a possible new train route that might travel through an additional tube under San Francisco Bay and into San Francisco's currently low-rise western neighborhoods. A drawing released with Streetsblog SF 's report shows the route crossing the Bay south of the current Transbay Tube, running from Alameda to Mission Bay. It's shown crossing Market Street northbound, heading west, then dividing, with one line going west to the cliffs of the Western Richmond District near the Fort Miley VA hospital, and the other heading southwest through the Sunset District outside the city's central ridge to rejoin the existing commuter line in Daly City. Streetsblog SF suggests the design may owe something to former BART board member James Fang's dream of "BART to the beach," an idea often dismissed in the past as not serving a dense enough population.

Attorney Robert May of the LA-based Telecom Law Firm writes in the San Francisco Daily Journal that a new order from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) could limit local power to regulate cell phone towers. The October 17 FCC approval interprets Sec. 6409 (a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 to allow the addition of new equipment within the areas of currently used wireless sites. He writes that new rules will "require local governments to do more, with less information, in a shorter time, or face harsher consequences." Among other rules, the order allows applicants to start construction if they receive no response to a qualifying permit application after 60 days, and allows them to file suit under "Shot Clock" rules when local governments delay responding to an application by "90 to 150 days depending on the application type." Telecom Law Firm has posted detailed analysis and commentary on the ruling at https://telecomlawfirm.com/sec6409/ . The FCC announcement is at http://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-boosts-wireless-broadband-easing-infrastructure-burdens . A statement attributed to FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler says the order responds to the reduced size of recent cell phone technology "by crafting a more efficient process for small deployments and other installations that do no trigger concerns about environmental protection for historic preservation." The Ninth Circuit upheld a grant of summary judgment against the National Resources Defense Council and local environmental groups in late October, allowing a project to go continue linking the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach to the I-405 freeway. The case is NRDC v. USDOT , No. 12-56467 . The Coastal Commission has requested rehearing in the Bowman sisters' case, now formally known as SDS Famly Trust v. CA Coastal Commission . This is the October 2014 Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) victory, reported at http://www.cp-dr.com/articles/node-3607 , in which the Second Appellate District reversed itself on rehearing. It allowed daughters who inherited a coastal property from their father to file a fresh application for a coastal development permit, removing the burden of a coastal access easement that had been imposed as a condition for granting a previously sought permit to their father. (The sisters' family trust is known as "SDS", hence the case name.) The PLF noted the review request indignantly on its blog and posted a copy of the request . The request challenges the court's decision to adopt a different version of the facts in October than it had related as part of its first decision in March. The request also challenges the court's October finding that the coastal easement was unfair because it had little to do with the work for which the coastal development permit was sought: renovations and rebuilding to a dilapidated farmstead a mile inland. The review request alleges the court made its more recent decision "based on facts that were different than those before the Commission and a legal theory undeveloped in the record below." It alleges the facts stated by the court "are not only directly contradicted by the record, but are also contrary to SDS's representations" to the Commission and the courts. It asks the court essentially to return to the March fact pattern (see http://www.cp-dr.com/articles/node-3452 ). That version says the current landowners' father did do some work on the property in anticipation of the first permit, thereby becoming bound by its terms. Further, the review request argues the Court had no right to exercise independent judgment about the fairness of the easement requirement. The Cambrian has local coverage . The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia threw out HUD's disparate-impact rule under the Fair Housing Act as of November 3 in American Insurance Association v. HUD . (Opinion may be downloadable here .) As of October 3 the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Texas Dept. of Housing v. Inclusive Communities , a Fifth Circuit appellate ruling on the distribution of affordable housing subsidies in Dallas. Forbes has a writeup of the Texas case . (Links to both via HAC News .) The State Supreme Court has denied review of an appellate ruling against Target Corporation in the recent case of Target Corp v. La Mirada Ave. Neighborhood Association . The LA Weekly reports the request for review concerned Target's request to resume construction of a store on Sunset Boulevard. As described by Curbed LA , the litigation had previously won an October order stopping construction of the store at Sunset and Western Avenue. It's another success for the La Mirada Avenue Neighborhood Association and its counsel, Robert Silverstein. They are profiled in the Weekly article , which includes a catalogue of their recent victories. The San Diego U-T reported that Superior Court Judge John Meyer upheld a $120 million infrastructure bond issue over a challenge brought by activist litigator Cory Briggs on behalf of San Diegans for Open Government. The paper said Meyer "essentially agreed" with Briggs that the bond issue was structured to avoid a public vote via "subterfuge", but that he ruled, "like it or not, it's legal." The League of California Cities noted a chance to comment to a State Supreme Court commission on the way California courts are run. The State Supreme court denied review of several appellate court orders in litigation between the Taxicab Paratransit Association of California and Internet-dispatched transit companies Uber, Lyft and Sidecar. Per the San Francisco Business Times , the taxi association has been suing since last year over the Public Utilities Commission's decision to legalize the "ride sharing" companies. See Supreme Court case numbers S218427, S220982, S218564 and Third Appellate District Case No. C076432, all at http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search.cfm?dist=0 . A writeup by the Nossaman firm discusses U.S.A. v. 1.41 Acres of Land (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2014). This ruling by California's Northern District federal court held the General Services Administration (GSA) could use an eminent domain action to increase the profitability of a sale of federal land, but only under specific disposal statutes, not the general authority of the GSA. The court refused to strike a defense noting that the property already had an access easement, hence didn't need the added land. The GSA had attempted to take a part of McKay Avenue in the town of Alameda, which belonged to the East Bay Regional Park District and adjoined the Crown Beach public park. The parcel to be augmented was vacant waterfront land next to the Alameda Federal Center, being sold to a private developer for $3.075 million. The decision text, placed online by the Nossaman firm, said that after the developer outbid the park district for the property, the city of Alameda zoned the property open-space only. The case goes to trial next October. The Supreme Court refused a depublication request made by Caltrans, the High-Speed Rail Authority, and other parties in Town of Atherton v. High-Speed Rail Authority, which upheld the programmatic EIR's analysis of a route through Pacheco Pass en route to the Peninsula. The underlying decision , issued in July by the Third Appellate District, is discussed in detail at http://www.cp-dr.com/articles/node-3540 . In Squires v. City of Eureka , landlords filed suit accusing Eureka city officials of singling them out for harassing code enforcement efforts; the city and individual defendants responded successfully with SLAPP suit motions for dismissal. The First District Court of Appeal upheld the trial court's dismissal in October and published its own decision November 14. The decision is at http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/A138768.PDF . The California Supreme Court denied review November 12 for an unpublished August decision in Harper v. Canyon Hills Community Association , by the Fourth District Court of Appeal. The ruling held that an aggrieved homeowner in a subdivision had no right to sue her neighbors for an encroaching contruction project based on their alleged violation of conditions, covenants and restrictions of the subdivision homeowners' association.  However, the appellate court upheld her claim against the homeowners' association for approving her neighbors' project, overturning a trial-level ruling that she bore the burden of showing the association's board did not act in good faith. The Fourth District ruling is at http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/G048445.PDF . The State Supreme Court refused a depublication request in Olive Lane Industrial Park, LLC v. County of San Diego . For prior brief coverage on this Fourth District case upholding a belated transfer of a Proposition 13 reassessment exclusion, see http://www.cp-dr.com/articles/node-3534 . In the case of Union Pacific Railroad v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines , the Second Appellate District ordered recalculation of rent rates in litigation pending since 1994 over the rent due from Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines and Kinder Morgan to the Union Pacific Railroad for use of easements allowing a pipeline along a railroad right of way established in the 19th century. The lengthy opinion includes extensive long-range historical discussion of Western railroads and pipelines and of the pipeline agreement in question. The Porterville Recorder reports former councilman Greg Shelton is claiming vindication from a recent opinion by state Attorney General Kamala Harris on purchases of former redevelopment property. The paper said Shelton purchased property in the local redevelopment zone in 2012, and that Shelton was saying the AG's opinion supported his purchase as legitimate because it was for a residence and not for speculative purposes. It reported the opinion followed from a query raised in 2012 by Assemblymember Connie Conway, R-Tulare. The opinion, at http://oag.ca.gov/system/files/opinions/pdfs/12-1204.pdf , provides that conflict-of-interest laws written for redevelopment agencies are still in effect with respect to members of the governing bodies of successor agencies. It says such provisions in general prohibit acquisition of real property by a member of such a governing body, and resignation from the body would not cure a violation of law committed through an improper acquisition. However, it includes among exemptions a mention of Health and Safety Code Sec. 33130.5 allowing purchase or lease of a project area property for "personal residential use" but "only after any needed property improvements have been completed, or when no improvements are needed." A Superior Court judge in San Jose allowed a contractor to go forward with construction on an aviation terminal primarily serving planes of Google executives. (CP&DR reported on a prior phase of San Jose airport litigation at http://www.cp-dr.com/articles/node-3526 .) Meanwhile Google signed a contract to lease Moffett Field, including the historic Hangar One, from NASA. See http://www.cnbc.com/id/102172594 . Developer-side law blogger Art Coon noted the case of Paulek v. CA Dept of Water Resources , a Fourth District Court of Appeal ruling issued October 31 . The case upheld a local activist's standing to bring a CEQA challenge the Perris Dam Remediation Project in Riverside County but rejected the challenge itself. The Department of Water Resources had argued that when appellant Albert Paulek spoke at a public hearing on the project, asking whether the project would achieve what it set out to do, he was raising questions but not making objections, and hence lacked standing to pursue them later. The court said Paulek raised objections sufficiently to qualify to bring a petition. However, the court rejected the challenge itself, which alleged that DWR, by removing plans to include an emergency outlet extension in the dam repair project would leave a flooding hazard unmitigated. It held the decision not to include the extension in the project was not improper segmentation. Further, the court held DWR's responses to comments were adequate, including on a question Paulek raised about cumulative impacts to habitat for the Stephens' kangaroo rat.

San Diego Climate Plan Ruling Ordered Published On November 24, the Fourth Appellate District's Division 1 issued a publication order for its October ruling rejecting San Diego's climate plan. That same day the same division issued its major decision rejecting the EIR for the San Diego Association of Governments' regional transportation plan. The effect was to give value as precedent to two cases that impose stricter greenhouse gas reduction standards on local and regional planners. Kruger Nominated To Fill State Supreme Court Vacancy Governor Jerry Brown has nominated Leondra Kruger, a senior Justice Department lawyer noted as a rising star, to fill the vacancy on the California Supreme Court created by the retirement of Justice Joyce Kennard. Kruger has argued a dozen cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, most prominently in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC , a 2012 case on the interaction of a religious employer's prerogatives with an employee's disability rights. Kruger has seldom taken positions on land use issues as an attorney, but as a Harvard undergraduate she had a front-row seat for the demise of Massachusetts rent control per a November 1994 statewide vote and she clerked for U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens , a former city attorney who often sided with government agencies on land use and property rights issues. Originally from Pasadena, she was editor of the Yale Law Journal, clerked for D.C. Circuit Judge David S. Tatel as well as Stevens, served briefly as a visiting professor at the University of Chicago, and worked with the firms of Jenner & Block and Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale & Dorr before joining the Justice Department. Migratory Bird Survey Removed From San Jose General Plan Agenda San Jose came close to approving a general plan amendment that would have required surveys of birds during the mid-year nesting season before any trees could be removed or disturbed. But the San Jose Mercury News reports the item was removed from a November 18 council agenda by "a last-minute decision." Planner Whitney Berry told the paper the plan was worked out with environmental, development/construction and Fish and Wildlife representatives in hopes of streamlining CEQA review. The paper says developers "expressed concerns" that it would slow development -- and then on November 14, current mayor Chuck Reed, mayor-elect Sam Liccardo, and Councilwoman Rose Herrera prepared a critical memo on the proposal, saying it amounted to "precluding construction for seven months of the year." The amendment was expected to resurface in revised form in 2015. It's Still Not Over In El Dorado County This November, El Dorado County voters defeated three slow-growth measures and the Placerville Roundabout Menace . The roundabout may have been knocked flat -- but there are more slow-growth initiatives where the last three came from. The Sacramento Bee reports the Board of Supervisors had held back two measures for further study, but has now agreed to place them on the June 2016 ballot. Both measures are directed against new subdivisions. One would prohibit subdivisions that lack sufficient access to water supplies. The other would protect views and areas near farmland. Long Beach Preparing For Freeway Removal Project The Long Beach City Council is expected to approve a contract December 2 with the Mel�ndrez firm of Los Angeles for planning and conceptual design services on the Terminal Island Freeway Transition Plan. The Longbeachize blog says it's a big step in moving forward on plans to remove a large section of the Terminal Island freeway, with accompanying plans to approve quality of life in the "park poor" area of West Long Beach. (Item via Streetsblog LA .) Does Mayor Of Benicia Have To Stop Commenting on Oil Trains? Should a mayor have to stop talking about a public issue for fear of showing bias on the subject? The question has come up in Benicia, where the Valero Refining Co. has proposed to bring crude oil by train to its refinery in the city. The Sacramento Bee reports Mayor Elizabeth Patterson of Benicia has disclosed that when she frequently commented on safety issues involving oil trains, the city attorney "advised her to stop talking about the oil trains and sending out mass emails containing articles and other information, and to recuse herself from voting when it came before the council". Patterson's comments on oil train safety have included "E-Alert" messages. In a recent email, she wrote regarding these messages: "What I do is repost national, regional and local stories about rail safety. My job is to affirm public, health, safety and welfare and to keep my constituents informed about these issues. No opinion is expressed." Her other public comments have included an op-ed in the San Francisco Chronicle last March calling on Governor Jerry Brown to issue an executive order on safety in the transport of petroleum products. The Council agreed on November 18 to waive its attorney-client privilege and release an opinion issued last summer that was the apparent source of the advice: it came from a city-retained outside attorney, Michael Jenkins of Jenkins & Hogin . A community Web site opposed to the oil trains, the Benicia Independent , has posted a copy of Jenkins' opinion . Jenkins wrote in part, "This is a close case. The evidence I have reviewed can be interpreted to suggest a probability of bias on the part of the Mayor." At issue is the prospect that Patterson would take on a quasi-judicial role in helping to adjudicate Valero's permit application for the oil train project, in which case the company would have a due process right to a hearing before a disinterested authority. In a more recent post on the Benicia Independent site, Patterson protested that Jenkins had reviewed her "E-Alert" statements selectively and that her own attorney had advised her differently. Benicia Approves Housing Element Update In separate November 18 City Council action, the city of Benicia voted to revise its housing element and to adopt an ordinance for transitional housing supportive housing and "emergency shelters", amid concern from Council member Marilyn Bardet that hazardous industrial materials might exist in the Arsenal historic district, which was identified as a site for transitional housing and shelters. For details see the Benicia Herald and the Council's November 18 agenda .

A new report released by the Public Policy Institute of California shows that California's housing market continues to recover from its low at the beginning of 2012. Median home values in the most populous counties have increased by 39 percent since 2012, though they remain 20 percent lower than they were at the market's peak in 2006-2007. The report also shows that the housing recovery has caused a problem for some less affluent residents, as "increasing prices place housing out of reach for many Californians." It finds that homeownership rates in California have fallen more sharply than the rest of the nation, with California falling to 53.8 percent as compared with a 64.7 percent nationwide. Another report  released by NYU's Furman Center describes the percentage changes in rental populations in major US cities from 2006 to 2013. Los Angeles and San Francisco rank among nine cities where more than 50% of the population rents, as of 2013. San Francisco scored in the top five increasing rental populations, with 22% more San Franciscans renting since 2006; Los Angeles' rental population increased by 11%. Richmond-San Rafael Bridge closer to getting new lane, bike path The Richmond-San Rafael Bridge near the northern end of the San Francisco Bay  is one step closer  to getting an extra lane of traffic and a new, separated bike path following an approval of $4.65 million for the project by a committee of the Bay Area Toll Authority. Though no structural work will be necessary on the bridge, officials say that some components on the ground will need to be adjusted on the 5.5-mile bridge to accommodate the new lanes, and they will need to reconstruct an approach on the east side of the bike path to protect bikers from traffic. The Bay Area Toll Authority hopes that the extensions will alleviate the increasing congestion on the bridge. The vote now goes to the full board of BATA for a vote on Feb. 25. Construction will not begin until 2017. SF Proposes Development Curbs in Mission District A San Francisco supervisor  is attempting to limit, or impose a full a moratorium on , the development of market-rate development in the Mission District, one of the most rapidly gentrifying neighborhoods in San Francisco. Supervisor David Campos said that he is responding to a community outcry in the district for more affordable housing.  "There has been a cry from the community for the last couple years that there is a housing crisis and the projects that are in the pipeline are not responding like it is a crisis," Campos told the San Francisco Business Journal.  He will likely propose legislation in the next few weeks that could attempt to either a moratorium on market-rate housing or create a special-use district near the 24 th  street BART.  So far, about 500 housing units in the district  have been approved for upcoming development  by the Planning Department, but only 34 affordable units have been generated. Prop. K, due on the ballot in November, will attempt to make one-third of all units in the city affordable. Property Owners Vote to Support Sacramento Streetcar Two-thirds of property owners near Sacramento's proposed new streetcar line  voted in favor  of providing funds to help finance the $150 million project. Project advocates said that the mail-in vote - while only advisory in nature- showed that local businesses are on board with the benefits that the trolley line would bring in creating a more vibrant downtown, boosting property values, and serving as a connector between historic and commercial locations. The Federal Transit Administration is also considering funding the 3.3-mile project this year with $75 million in requested money, covering half the project's cost. In May, a an advisory ballot measure will go before 3,800 voters who live within three blocks of the project. Chargers, Raiders Propose Shared Stadium in Carson The San Diego Chargers and Oakland Raiders recently  made a surprise proposal  to build a shared stadium in a city near Los Angeles. The teams announced that they will continue to pursue options for stadium deals in their current cities, but that they will jointly pursue the $1.7 billion stadium in Carson as an alternative. Both the Chargers and the Raiders are on year-to-year leases with their current stadiums, and both teams have shown restlessness with city reluctance to fund new stadiums with taxpayer dollars. The teams stated that they plan to launch a petition drive immediately to put the stadium to a vote of city residents. Gold Line Authority Pushes for Extension to Montclair The Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority, which is constructing Phase II of the Gold Line light rail in eastern Los Angeles County, has asked for funding for the next phase, from Azusa to Montclair. It would be the first light rail line to reach into San Bernardino County -  have asked for a transfer  of $33 million in sales taxes for the 12.3 mile extension. The money would come from leftover construction funds from an 11.5-mile extension from East Pasadena to the Azusa city limits, which will be completed in September. The authority says that it has already completed its Environmental Impact Report and hopes that it can get the funding to be ready for operation by 2023. Proponents say that the $1.18 billion project should undoubtedly be a priority for the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority, but with several other public transportation projects fighting for money, it could be difficult to get the needed funds. "I would say there is no question our project (Azusa-to-Montclair Gold Line) should be a priority. But this is a political game," Doug Tessitor from the Construction Authority Board told the San Gabriel Valley Tribune.

The demise of redevelopment may leave the city of San Diego with a monstrous bill : $271 million to cover the development of its downtown stadium, Petco Park. When the stadium's financing plan was approved in 1998, general obligation bond funds were to be routed through the Center City Development Corp., one of the city's redevelopment agencies. In anticipation of the 2012 shutdown of redevelopment, CCDC transferred over $200 million to the city. The state then determined that these funds were not authorized for exemption from state "claw-back." In a 9-0 vote earlier this month, the City Council determined that it would pursue legal action against the state. Opponents of Sacramento Arena Raise EIR Concerns in Court Foes of the efforts to build a new stadium for the Sacramento Kings  aired their concerns in court  earlier this month, calling the project's environmental impact report inadequate. Justices in the Court of Appeals asked lawyers for the city whether planners had surveyed other alternative sites and considered the impact of stadium traffic on I-5. Opponents of the project are concerned about a $255 million public subsidy that the city is giving to the arena, and that state lawmakers passed SB 743, written specifically for the project and intended to make it much harder for foes to block construction. The hearing ended without a ruling. Sen. Jackson Seeks to Streamline CEQA Process The  latest attempt to reform CEQA  comes from State Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson (Dist. 19 � Santa Barbara). Her bill, SB 122, attempts to streamline the CEQA process but does not make substantive changes to the law. SB 122 would make lead agencies keep an administrative record of all actions on a project in real time. Jackson claims that this change would help streamline much of the data-gathering process, which is now typically done only after a lawsuit is filed. The bill would also establish an online clearinghouse through the Office of Planning and Research that would post all documents relating to environmental impact reports across the state. Finally, the bill would reform what Jackson calls "document dumping" at the scheduled close of the public comment period on draft EIRs. City of San Francisco Must Pay for Tree Upkeep The San Francisco Board of Supervisors agreed that the city's Department of Public Works, not local property owners,  should be responsible for upkeep of the city's street trees . The vote is a move away from dumping the cost of tree maintenance to homeowners and is in line with the Planning Department's Urban Forest Master Plan. But, the supervisors did not allocate any money toward the $15 million annual cost of upkeep.  That could be the toughest part, as Supervisor Scott Weiner said, "trees don't do well in the budget process." A parcel tax is being considered for the 2016 ballot. Meanwhile, the city is hoping to add 50,000 street trees to its urban forest by 2035. San Diego Awash in Unused Development Impact Fees An investigation by the San Diego Union-Tribune  found that the city has let pile up millions  of unspent dollars of developer impact fees, designed to offset the local impacts of big projects. These monies may be used for local infrastructure projects such as parks and fire stations. Over $78 million collected has not been spent as of June 2014; $35 million of that has not been designated for any specific purpose. Public officials have expressed frustration in the wake of a staggering backlog of infrastructure improvements in the city that have not been fixed. Ranking Gentrification in California According to a new ranking of incidence of gentrification in America's 50 largest cities, Sacramento and Oakland are the most rapidly gentrifying cities in California. Governing Magazine ranked them Nos. 9 and 11, respectively, in its "Gentrification in America" report. Around 30 percent of both cities' census tracts were determined to have gentrified since 2000. Though California cities have some of the highest rents in the country, cities including San Diego, San Francisco and San Jose ranked lower in part because they have already gentrified dramatically. The report defined a neighborhood as gentrified if growth in its median household income and home value was in the top third percentile as compared with other neighborhoods in its metro area; median incomes and home values had to be in the bottom 40% in 2000 for a neighborhood to be eligible. High Speed Rail Opposition Files Petition Two counties in the Central Valley  have filed a petition with the 9th District Court of Appeals , hoping to overturn a ruling by a federal agency prohibiting state courts from citing CEQA in opposition to the high speed rail coming to California. The Surface Transportation Board ruled in December that the state couldn't use CEQA because doing so could "deny or significantly delay an entity's right to construct a line that the (Surface Transportation) Board has specifically authorized, thus impinging upon the board's exclusive jurisdiction over rail transportation." Kings County and Kern County, in association with several anti-HSR groups in the Central Valley and Bay Area, contend that the previous ruling "violates petitioners' constitutional right to seek redress of grievances" and that it violates California's sovereignty as guaranteed by the 10th Amendment.

In California land use news this week: The Monterey Herald is reporting that Cal American Water has settled with landowner Cemex ahead of its Coastal Commission appearance on Wednesday to seek permission to drill a test well under the City of Marina. The well would go under the sea floor to check if water could be taken from that area for a desalination plant proposed for the Cemex sand mining site in North Marina. Cal Am and Cemex had been on the point of litigation . Marina officials have criticized the plan because they feared that it might worsen saltwater intrusion into groundwater and that, once dug, it might be used permanently for extraction, not just for testing. The Commission's agenda packet as of this writing showed a staff recommendation for conditional approval. For prior coverage see http://www.cp-dr.com/articles/node-3610 . The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) has proposed to cut two BART stations planned for San Jose and Santa Clara. The station in San Jose, on 28th Street in the Alum Rock area, has been popular with its proposed neighbors, who worked willingly with public officials on a transit-oriented development project. Details via Planetizen at http://www.planetizen.com/articles/node-71983 and in the San Francisco Business Times . The HomeAway vacation rental Web site has sued San Francisco over the city's recently passed law legalizing certain vacation rentals, saying it favors Airbnb over other companies. Carolyn Said reported on the dispute in the San Francisco Chronicle . As she noted, City Attorney Dennis Herrera posted a statement saying he would "vigorously defend" against the suit, and complaining, "HomeAway's challenge pushes a dubious legal theory that the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause somehow prohibits local jurisdictions from making local land use decisions." The VTA issued an environmental assessment on its planned Bus Rapid Transit project along El Camino from Palo Alto to San Jose. See http://www.vta.org/el-camino-brt . Reports of the death of "dinosaur planning" may be exaggerated. The LA Times reported last week on the opening of a partly built first "neighborhood" of a 1200-unit "community" to be known as Park Place, in the enormous planned "New Model Colony" town in Ontario, California. The paper describes it as "the first New Model Colony project to debut since the financial crisis." Economist Gerd-Ulf Krueger told the paper, "The dinosaurs... have come alive." Los Angeles Metro held a groundbreaking on the Purple Line . For initial reactions see the #purpleline Twitter hashtag. Ethan Elkind posted a bittersweet note of celebration . The LA Times reports the line that was once dreamed of as the "subway to the sea" will in fact most likely stop at the VA hospital in Westwood. It's a long if pretty walk from there to the ocean. The Sacramento Bee reported the Kings basketball team released plans for mixed-use residential, commercial and office construction ancillary to their new arena in downtown Sacramento. A Modesto group, Stamp Out Sprawl, started a petition drive to place an urban growth boundary limit on the November 2015 ballot to steer big-box retail stores away from the Wood Colony area. The Modesto Bee has details at http://www.modbee.com/news/local/article3545807.html . The LA Times reported the Zillow real estate site found 47.9% of working-age adults in Los Angeles and Orange Counties live with a roommate or adult family member other than a spouse. On the real-estate-oriented HousingWire site, that story led to a somewhat different headline: " Zillow: Millions of potential houses lost to 'doubling up' ". The original Zillow report refers to the doubled-up people as "hidden households." As anyone knows who was at the APA-California convention in September, the Disneyland area of Anaheim could use a smoother transportation setup between the theme parks and convention center, and the many blocks of hotels that serve them. Now Planetizen reports some critics are seeing connections between Disney's political contributions and a proposal for a streetcar in the area. A hearing is set for November 12 on Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approval of the Antelope Valley Area Plan and its EIR, discussed in our recent news feature at http://www.cp-dr.com/articles/node-3603 . For plan materials see http://planning.lacounty.gov/tnc/ . For the Board of Supervisors agenda see the November 12 entry at http://bos.co.la.ca.us/BoardMeeting/BoardAgendas.aspx . Links to the Board's agenda materials are at http://file.lacounty.gov/bos/supdocs/89590.pdf and include a 118-page draft Statement of Overriding Considerations. An initial hearing was held November 5 on a draft renewable energy ordinance for unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County, including some large high desert tracts where large solar arrays have been controversially proposed. See http://planning.lacounty.gov/energy . The Sacramento Bee reports the solar industry is rebounding after losing ground during the home mortgage crisis. Investigative freelancer Darwin Bond Graham writes on his blog that the exclusive city of Piedmont is willing to allow affordable housing in its Housing Element, but principally by encouraging owners of large houses or lots to add second units -- in some cases by re-converting actual former servants' quarters into -- yep, servants' quarters again. The Los Angeles Times reports the statewide plastic bag ban is actually kind of popular . Last week the LA Times reported in detail on seismic protections in the New Wilshire Grand tower . Los Angeles is in a quandary over increasing costs of privately contracted street tree maintenance. Planetizen has a roundup at http://www.planetizen.com/articles/node-71873 of attempts by the City of Lancaster to close its Metrolink station, which serves 400 commuters, based on claims that it brings homeless people to the city. Planetizen picked up a plan to spend $2.8 million developing a rail trail along Slauson Avenue in Los Angeles. See www.planetizen.com/articles/node-71893 . And The Planning Report has an interview with Esther Feldman of Community Conservation Solutions about Zev Yaroslavsky's work creating a missing link for walkers in the LA River Greenway Trail. Stockton is officially out of bankruptcy .

President Obama's proposed 2016 budget, announced last week, includes several nods to development and transportation in California to the tune of over $1 billion. In the plan, Los Angeles  would receive $330 million  for an expansion of the Purple Line of its subway, along with a downtown connector to tie together several strands of the system.  The budget also included $150 million  to fund a streetcar line  in downtown Sacramento. To receive the money, the city has to get approval from residents within three blocks of the proposed line, and it will have to raise $30 million in matching funds from property owners nearby. Officials hope to have the trolley operating by 2018.  Some of the projects that are likely to survive Congressional whittling,  according to the Sacramento Bee : restoration projects of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, upgrades to Yosemite National Park, and funding for improvements to Central Valley flood control. Meanwhile ,  the  San Diego Union-Tribune pondered  the fate of a new stadium for the Chargers - a hotly debated subject in San Diego - if Obama's budget is passed. O ne proposal within the budget would bar cities from issuing tax-free bonds to finance new projects for professional sports facilities, an incentive usually used to push stadiums through.  "This is one of those areas where there's consensus among economics professors that these are not good projects for the use of public dollars," said one urban planning professor. Property Owners Decide Against Protest of Transbay Vote A group of heavyweight property owners  decided not to sue  the City and County of San Francisco over the creation of a new Mello-Roos tax district to help fund the Transbay transit center, which is currently under construction. The creation of the district was approved in December by a vote of over 50 percent of local property-owners. Developers with nearby projects, including Hines and Boston Properties, objected to the fact that the vote on the tax district had been a foregone conclusion, since government agencies own over 50 percent of land in the area and therefore had a built-in majority. Opponents had also objected to a tax increase from $3.33 to $5.11 per square foot since the special district was first proposed in 2012. Opponents had 30 days from the original vote to file a protest, but they did not do so, meaning that the election is certified and the district is officially approved.  Wastewater Pumping Taints Central Valley Drinking Water As the historic drought continues, California water users in the Central Valley have had to resort to groundwater pumping to get the water that they need, causing land in the Central Valley to actually sink. Things just got a lot scarier, as the  San Francisco Chronicle  reported that oil companies have been pumping wastewater laden with bits of oil back into the ground due to bureaucratic errors in enforcement of bans against that pumping. The EPA is investigating whether the wastewater pumping has polluted groundwater, and it could seize control of the injection wells from California officials. Santa Ana Uses Blind Luck to Permit Marijuana Dispensaries Santa Ana  employed a lottery system  to determine who would get one of the 19 permits issued for medical marijuana dispensaries in the city, becoming the first city in Orange County to issue the permits since most California cities banned the shops years ago. However, some criticized the structure of the lottery system, saying that officials should have done preliminary screening before opening up the lottery to over 630 applications.  "Instead of going through all of this ... you should be vetting people up front, figuring out who doesn't have a criminal record and all of that, and then have the lottery," attorney Randall T. Longwith said. Quarry Rejected in SLO The San Luis Obispo County Planning Commission  narrowly rejected  a 41-acre granite quarry in Santa Margarita following community opposition over traffic impacts on the town. Commissioners cited concerns of an increase in traffic and the safety of trucks carrying heavy granite through downtown Santa Margarita as reasons for the rejection.  Further south in San Luis Obispo County, developer Tom Blessent  proposed a housing project  that would triple the size of the community of Avila Beach, adding 1,000 to 1,500 homes. The developer is expected to face heavy resistance from conservationists, who failed at an attempt to conserve all 2,400 acres of Wild Cherry Canyon. Atkins Proposes Plan to Fund Infrastructure Assembly Speaker Toni Atkins released a plan to fund California's crumbling infrastructure following Governor Jerry Brown's call for statewide improvements. Citing the problem of increasingly fuel-efficient cars stifling the money that the state raise from gas taxes, Atkins proposed a $52 per year tax on California drivers. The tax could be tacked on to insurance bills or vehicle registration charges.