top of page

Another CEQA Loss For UC Berkeley

In the latest legal wrangling over enrollment expansion at UC Berkeley, an Alameda County Superior Court judge has ordered the university to set aside its 2019 approval or a new housing project for students at the Goldman School of Public Policy. According to the local publication Berkeleyside, the city and the university may soon reach an out-of-court agreement on how to handle the impact of expanded enrollment – although a Berkeley residents group may challenge that agreement as well. UC Berkeley’s enrollment has more than predicted in recent years, to almost 40,000 students, leading to a variety of disputes under the California Environmental Quality Act among the university, the City of Berkeley, and Berkeley residents. Last year, for example, the First District Court of Appeal ruled that the University must do a CEQA analysis not just on additions to the university’s buildings such as additional housing but also to the mere act of increasing enrollment. Meanwhile, in 2019, the City of Berkeley and a group called Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods sued the University over its CEQA analysis of the Goldman School’s so-called Upper Hearst project, which would provide the Goldman School with additional space of various kinds, including faculty and student housing. The building would be constructed on the site of the Upper Hearst Parking Structure on the corner of Hearst and La Loma just north of the campus. The University did a supplemental environmental impact report tiered off the EIR for its 2020 Long-Range Development Plan, the university’s equivalent of a general plan.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to cp-dr.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Recent Posts

See All
Welcome to the new CP&DR website!

We are happy to announce CP&DR’s website has been successfully moved to a new host! If you are a current subscriber we have set up your profile on this new website, and have credited you with full

 
 
A Cheeky Plan To Win CEQA Attorney's Fees Fails

A Berkeley citizen group lost its challenge to People's Park in the legislature and the California Supreme Court. But that didn't stop the group from claiming enough of a victory to seek $1 million in

 
 
bottom of page