Search Results

A case which says a city can delegate final approval of its housing element to the city manager -- and not hold a final approval -- has been published by the Fourth District Court of Appeal.

A potentially important case involving the California Environmental Quality Act from Eureka has been published, meaning it can now be used as precedent in other cases.

A local jurisdiction can’t condition the completion of a permit application on environmental information not included in the permit’s application checklist.

Reversing a lower court ruling, an appellate court has thrown out the City of Mount Shasta’s mitigated negative declaration for a charter school and ordered the city to do an environmental impact report. The ruling would seem to run counter to the current trend – at least in the legislature – to minimize the use of EIRs.

Opponents of downtown affordable housing in Eureka may have lost a ballot measure last fall, but they are continuing a barrage of litigation to try to stop conversion of three downtown parking lots to housing.

State laws override local land-use ballot measures.

In a new battle between the Tejon Ranch Company and environmentalists, an appellate court has ruled that Los Angeles County’s environmental impact report for the Centennial community in Antelope Valley was misleading because it tried to count “upstream” reductions in greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the state’s cap-and-trade program.

Does adopting a Housing Element violate the California Environmental Quality Act?

Only days after one judge ordered the City of Fresno to approve a housing project it had denied, another judge has ordered the city to redo the environmental impact report on one of the largest-ever Costco projects. Among other things, the court ruling shows that zoning ordinances are having a difficult time dealing with the increasingly blurry line between large retail stores and warehouses.

In a followup to last year’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling, an appellate court in Sacramento has ruled that El Dorado County’s traffic impact fee system is constitutional and meets the so-called Nollan/Dolan standard. The case is almost certain to be appealed by the Pacific Legal Foundation, which is representing the El Dorado County property owner who brought the suit.

A Los Angeles judge has ruled that the Beverly Hills housing element is “deficient” in a variety of ways, including the city’s calculations of potential housing development based on its current density standards. The city has announced plans to appeal the ruling, but if ity loses on appeal that could open the door for several builder’s remedy projects that have been proposed by a single developer.

A water deal between Fairfield and Solano County – which will facilitate development outside Fairfield’s urban limit line – has been upheld by an appellate court in a published decision, meaning it can be used as precedent in other cases. Opponents framed the whole issue as a possible prelude to a similar deal for California Forever, though this seems unlikely, at least at this point.